Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CENTENNIAL HILLS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CENTENNIAL HILLS HOSPITAL
CCN 290054 | NV | 326 beds | Current EBITDA $32.6M → Pro Forma $49.3M (+$16.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$318.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$32.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$16.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$49.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$12.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$16.8M
Modeled Uplift
$11.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $11.8M (vs $16.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$204K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$16.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.4M$6.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.1M$175K$6.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$977K$2.9M$3.9M$12.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$204K$204K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT20.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.8M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.7M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$102K$204K$204K$204K$204K$204K$204K
Cumulative$0$4.6M$9.1M$13.6M$16.8M$16.8M$16.8M$16.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $16.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x55% / 9.0x60% / 10.3x64% / 11.7x65% / 12.4x67% / 13.1x
9.0x50% / 7.6x55% / 8.8x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x
10.0x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x
11.0x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
12.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.9x
Headroom (turns)
14%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 14% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.6x, adding 2.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$32.6M$32.6M10.2%
Year 1$33.6M+$11.2M$44.7M14.0%
Year 2$34.6M+$16.8M$51.3M16.1%
Year 3$35.6M+$16.8M$52.4M16.4%
Year 4$36.7M+$16.8M$53.4M16.8%
Year 5$37.8M+$16.8M$54.5M17.1%
$325.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$599.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$274.0M
Value Created
$54.5M
Exit EBITDA
$51.9M
Organic Growth
$167.6M
RCM Value Creation
$54.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.2M$4.8M$6.4M$7.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.2M$4.7M$6.3M$7.6M
A/R Days Reduction$1.9M$2.9M$3.9M$4.7M
Clean Claim Rate$102K$153K$204K$245K
Total$8.4M$12.6M$16.8M$20.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 16 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin10.2%-9.4%3.0%10.6%
P69
Net-to-Gross8.4%8.5%11.1%20.3%
P19
Occupancy74.3%74.2%77.8%83.2%
P25
Rev/Bed$977K$836K$1.1M$1.5M
P38
Exp/Bed$877K$853K$1.0M$1.4M
P25

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML