Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — RENOWN SOUTH MEADOWS MED CTR 2026-04-26 05:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — RENOWN SOUTH MEADOWS MED CTR
CCN 290049 | NV | 78 beds | Current EBITDA $3.6M → Pro Forma $8.4M (+$4.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$91.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$8.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$4.8M
Modeled Uplift
$3.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.4M (vs $4.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$58K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.8M$1.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.8M$50K$1.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$279K$828K$1.1M$3.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$58K$58K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT53.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$455K$910K$1.4M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$451K$901K$1.4M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$369K$739K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$29K$58K$58K$58K$58K$58K$58K
Cumulative$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.9M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x72% / 14.9x76% / 16.9x80% / 18.9x82% / 19.9x84% / 20.9x
9.0x67% / 12.9x71% / 14.7x75% / 16.5x77% / 17.4x79% / 18.2x
10.0x62% / 11.3x67% / 12.9x71% / 14.5x73% / 15.3x74% / 16.1x
11.0x58% / 9.9x63% / 11.4x67% / 12.9x69% / 13.6x70% / 14.3x
12.0x55% / 8.8x59% / 10.2x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.9x
Headroom (turns)
44%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 44% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.6x, adding 4.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.6M$3.6M4.0%
Year 1$3.7M+$3.2M$6.9M7.6%
Year 2$3.8M+$4.8M$8.6M9.5%
Year 3$4.0M+$4.8M$8.8M9.6%
Year 4$4.1M+$4.8M$8.9M9.7%
Year 5$4.2M+$4.8M$9.0M9.9%
$36.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$98.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$62.7M
Value Created
$9.0M
Exit EBITDA
$5.8M
Organic Growth
$47.9M
RCM Value Creation
$9.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$910K$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$901K$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M
A/R Days Reduction$554K$831K$1.1M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$29K$44K$58K$70K
Total$2.4M$3.6M$4.8M$5.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 18 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.0%-8.5%2.2%10.4%
P56
Net-to-Gross25.9%28.7%37.4%53.3%
P17
Occupancy62.1%56.3%62.8%70.9%
P44
Rev/Bed$1.2M$206K$442K$782K
P78
Exp/Bed$1.1M$239K$453K$599K
P78

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML