Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SPRING VALLEY HOSPITAL MEDICAL CNTR 2026-04-26 06:39 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SPRING VALLEY HOSPITAL MEDICAL CNTR
CCN 290046 | NV | 301 beds | Current EBITDA $33.6M → Pro Forma $54.5M (+$20.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$397.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$33.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$20.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$54.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$15.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$20.9M
Modeled Uplift
$15.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $15.0M (vs $20.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$255K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$20.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.0M$8.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.7M$219K$7.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.2M$3.6M$4.8M$15.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$255K$255K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT22.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.0M$4.0M$6.0M$8.0M$8.0M$8.0M$8.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.0M$3.9M$5.9M$7.9M$7.9M$7.9M$7.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$127K$255K$255K$255K$255K$255K$255K
Cumulative$0$5.7M$11.4M$17.0M$20.9M$20.9M$20.9M$20.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $20.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.2x66% / 12.7x68% / 13.4x70% / 14.1x
9.0x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.6x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.2x
10.0x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x
11.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x
12.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.3x
Headroom (turns)
20%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 20% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.2x, adding 3.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$33.6M$33.6M8.4%
Year 1$34.6M+$14.0M$48.5M12.2%
Year 2$35.6M+$20.9M$56.5M14.2%
Year 3$36.7M+$20.9M$57.6M14.5%
Year 4$37.8M+$20.9M$58.7M14.8%
Year 5$38.9M+$20.9M$59.8M15.0%
$335.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$658.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$322.6M
Value Created
$59.8M
Exit EBITDA
$53.5M
Organic Growth
$209.3M
RCM Value Creation
$59.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.0M$6.0M$8.0M$9.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.9M$5.9M$7.9M$9.5M
A/R Days Reduction$2.4M$3.6M$4.8M$5.8M
Clean Claim Rate$127K$191K$255K$305K
Total$10.5M$15.7M$20.9M$25.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 18 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin8.4%-20.9%1.5%10.1%
P61
Net-to-Gross8.9%8.6%11.4%22.6%
P28
Occupancy77.5%68.9%77.3%82.7%
P50
Rev/Bed$1.3M$642K$1.0M$1.5M
P67
Exp/Bed$1.2M$695K$966K$1.4M
P61

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML