Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. ROSE DOMINICAN - SIENA 2026-04-26 09:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. ROSE DOMINICAN - SIENA
CCN 290045 | NV | 326 beds | Current EBITDA $-17.8M → Pro Forma $8.3M (+$26.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$496.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-17.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$26.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$8.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$19.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$26.1M
Modeled Uplift
$19.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$7.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $19.0M (vs $26.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$9.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$9.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$317K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$26.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$9.9M$9.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$9.5M$273K$9.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.5M$4.5M$6.0M$19.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$317K$317K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT20.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.5M$5.0M$7.4M$9.9M$9.9M$9.9M$9.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.5M$4.9M$7.4M$9.8M$9.8M$9.8M$9.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.0M$4.0M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$159K$317K$317K$317K$317K$317K$317K
Cumulative$0$7.1M$14.2M$21.2M$26.1M$26.1M$26.1M$26.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $26.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-18.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
24.6x
Headroom (turns)
379%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 379% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -18.1x, adding 117.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-17.8M$-17.8M-3.6%
Year 1$-18.3M+$17.4M$-921K-0.2%
Year 2$-18.9M+$26.1M$7.2M1.5%
Year 3$-19.4M+$26.1M$6.7M1.3%
Year 4$-20.0M+$26.1M$6.1M1.2%
Year 5$-20.6M+$26.1M$5.5M1.1%
$-177.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$60.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$238.1M
Value Created
$5.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-28.3M
Organic Growth
$260.9M
RCM Value Creation
$5.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.0M$7.4M$9.9M$11.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.9M$7.4M$9.8M$11.8M
A/R Days Reduction$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$7.2M
Clean Claim Rate$159K$238K$317K$381K
Total$13.0M$19.6M$26.1M$31.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 16 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.6%-9.4%3.0%10.6%
P25
Net-to-Gross12.1%8.5%11.1%20.3%
P50
Occupancy82.9%74.2%77.8%83.2%
P69
Rev/Bed$1.5M$836K$1.1M$1.5M
P69
Exp/Bed$1.6M$853K$1.0M$1.4M
P81

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML