Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — VALLEY HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 04:02 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — VALLEY HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 290021 | NV | 297 beds | Current EBITDA $9.3M → Pro Forma $25.9M (+$16.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$315.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$9.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$16.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$25.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$12.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$16.6M
Modeled Uplift
$12.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $12.3M (vs $16.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$202K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$16.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.3M$6.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.1M$174K$6.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$969K$2.9M$3.8M$12.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$202K$202K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT22.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.7M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.6M$3.1M$4.7M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$101K$202K$202K$202K$202K$202K$202K
Cumulative$0$4.5M$9.0M$13.5M$16.6M$16.6M$16.6M$16.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $16.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x79% / 18.3x83% / 20.7x87% / 23.1x89% / 24.3x91% / 25.5x
9.0x74% / 15.9x78% / 18.0x82% / 20.2x84% / 21.2x86% / 22.3x
10.0x69% / 14.0x74% / 15.9x78% / 17.8x80% / 18.8x82% / 19.7x
11.0x66% / 12.4x70% / 14.2x74% / 15.9x76% / 16.8x78% / 17.6x
12.0x62% / 11.1x66% / 12.7x70% / 14.3x72% / 15.1x74% / 15.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.5x
Headroom (turns)
53%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 53% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.0x, adding 5.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$9.3M$9.3M2.9%
Year 1$9.6M+$11.1M$20.6M6.5%
Year 2$9.9M+$16.6M$26.5M8.4%
Year 3$10.2M+$16.6M$26.8M8.5%
Year 4$10.5M+$16.6M$27.1M8.6%
Year 5$10.8M+$16.6M$27.4M8.7%
$92.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$301.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$208.2M
Value Created
$27.4M
Exit EBITDA
$14.8M
Organic Growth
$166.1M
RCM Value Creation
$27.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.2M$4.7M$6.3M$7.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.1M$4.7M$6.3M$7.5M
A/R Days Reduction$1.9M$2.9M$3.8M$4.6M
Clean Claim Rate$101K$152K$202K$242K
Total$8.3M$12.5M$16.6M$19.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 18 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.9%-20.9%1.5%10.1%
P50
Net-to-Gross7.7%8.6%11.4%22.6%
P6
Occupancy89.7%68.9%77.3%82.7%
P89
Rev/Bed$1.1M$642K$1.0M$1.5M
P50
Exp/Bed$1.0M$695K$966K$1.4M
P56

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML