Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 06:38 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 290007 | NV | 537 beds | Current EBITDA $-13.0M → Pro Forma $31.7M (+$44.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$849.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-13.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$44.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$31.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$32.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$44.7M
Modeled Uplift
$31.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$13.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $31.4M (vs $44.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$17.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$16.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$10.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$543K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$44.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$17.0M$17.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$16.3M$467K$16.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.6M$7.7M$10.3M$32.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$543K$543K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT18.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$4.2M$8.5M$12.7M$17.0M$17.0M$17.0M$17.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$4.2M$8.4M$12.6M$16.8M$16.8M$16.8M$16.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$3.4M$6.9M$10.3M$10.3M$10.3M$10.3M$10.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$272K$543K$543K$543K$543K$543K$543K
Cumulative$0$12.2M$24.3M$36.2M$44.7M$44.7M$44.7M$44.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $44.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-3.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
10.0x
Headroom (turns)
153%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 153% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -3.5x, adding 102.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-13.0M$-13.0M-1.5%
Year 1$-13.4M+$29.8M$16.4M1.9%
Year 2$-13.8M+$44.7M$30.9M3.6%
Year 3$-14.2M+$44.7M$30.5M3.6%
Year 4$-14.6M+$44.7M$30.0M3.5%
Year 5$-15.1M+$44.7M$29.6M3.5%
$-130.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$325.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$455.5M
Value Created
$29.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-20.7M
Organic Growth
$446.6M
RCM Value Creation
$29.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$8.5M$12.7M$17.0M$20.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$8.4M$12.6M$16.8M$20.2M
A/R Days Reduction$5.2M$7.7M$10.3M$12.4M
Clean Claim Rate$272K$408K$543K$652K
Total$22.3M$33.5M$44.7M$53.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 12 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-1.5%-2.9%4.6%10.8%
P33
Net-to-Gross19.1%8.4%9.3%18.7%
P75
Occupancy82.0%76.4%82.4%88.3%
P42
Rev/Bed$1.6M$951K$1.1M$1.4M
P83
Exp/Bed$1.6M$892K$1.0M$1.3M
P92

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML