Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MADONNA REHABILITATION LTC HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 06:16 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MADONNA REHABILITATION LTC HOSPITAL
CCN 282000 | NE | 77 beds | Current EBITDA $-15.7M → Pro Forma $-6.3M (+$9.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$177.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-15.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$9.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-6.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$6.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$9.3M
Modeled Uplift
$6.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $6.3M (vs $9.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$113K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$9.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.5M$3.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.4M$97K$3.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$544K$1.6M$2.2M$6.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$113K$113K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$886K$1.8M$2.7M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$877K$1.8M$2.6M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$719K$1.4M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$57K$113K$113K$113K$113K$113K$113K
Cumulative$0$2.5M$5.1M$7.6M$9.3M$9.3M$9.3M$9.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $9.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-15.7M$-15.7M-8.8%
Year 1$-16.1M+$6.2M$-9.9M-5.6%
Year 2$-16.6M+$9.3M$-7.3M-4.1%
Year 3$-17.1M+$9.3M$-7.8M-4.4%
Year 4$-17.6M+$9.3M$-8.3M-4.7%
Year 5$-18.1M+$9.3M$-8.8M-5.0%
$-156.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$-97.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$59.4M
Value Created
$-8.8M
Exit EBITDA
$-24.9M
Organic Growth
$93.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-8.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.8M$2.7M$3.5M$4.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.8M$2.6M$3.5M$4.2M
A/R Days Reduction$1.1M$1.6M$2.2M$2.6M
Clean Claim Rate$57K$85K$113K$136K
Total$4.7M$7.0M$9.3M$11.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 19 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-8.8%-11.7%-8.8%5.5%
P42
Net-to-Gross42.5%30.0%37.4%42.5%
P68
Occupancy45.7%41.2%46.7%60.8%
P42
Rev/Bed$2.3M$1.4M$1.8M$2.6M
P58
Exp/Bed$2.5M$1.4M$2.0M$2.7M
P63

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML