Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — JENNIE M. MELHAM MEMORIAL MED CENTER 2026-04-26 14:13 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — JENNIE M. MELHAM MEMORIAL MED CENTER
CCN 281365 | NE | 23 beds | Current EBITDA $760K → Pro Forma $1.7M (+$978K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$18.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$760K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$978K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$713K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

59%
Realization (C)
$978K
Modeled Uplift
$579K
Risk-Adjusted
-$400K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood

Expected realization: 59% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$372K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$368K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$226K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$12K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$978K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$372K$372K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$358K$10K$368K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$57K$169K$226K$713K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$12K$12K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT78.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$93K$186K$279K$372K$372K$372K$372K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$92K$184K$276K$368K$368K$368K$368K
A/R Days Reduction$0$75K$151K$226K$226K$226K$226K$226K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K
Cumulative$0$266K$533K$793K$978K$978K$978K$978K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $978K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x71% / 14.7x75% / 16.6x79% / 18.6x81% / 19.6x83% / 20.6x
9.0x66% / 12.7x71% / 14.4x75% / 16.2x76% / 17.1x78% / 18.0x
10.0x62% / 11.1x66% / 12.7x70% / 14.2x72% / 15.0x74% / 15.8x
11.0x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.2x66% / 12.7x68% / 13.4x70% / 14.1x
12.0x54% / 8.7x59% / 10.0x63% / 11.3x64% / 12.0x66% / 12.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.8x
Headroom (turns)
43%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 43% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.7x, adding 4.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$760K$760K4.1%
Year 1$782K+$652K$1.4M7.7%
Year 2$806K+$978K$1.8M9.6%
Year 3$830K+$978K$1.8M9.7%
Year 4$855K+$978K$1.8M9.9%
Year 5$881K+$978K$1.9M10.0%
$7.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$20.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$12.9M
Value Created
$1.9M
Exit EBITDA
$1.2M
Organic Growth
$9.8M
RCM Value Creation
$1.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$186K$279K$372K$446K
Denial Rate Reductio$184K$276K$368K$442K
A/R Days Reduction$113K$170K$226K$272K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$12K$14K
Total$489K$734K$978K$1.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 66 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.1%-13.0%-5.0%0.8%
P80
Net-to-Gross77.7%62.2%71.1%78.8%
P71
Occupancy12.5%11.6%17.6%24.8%
P27
Rev/Bed$809K$763K$1.3M$1.8M
P26
Exp/Bed$775K$789K$1.4M$1.8M
P24

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML