Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PHELPS MEMORIAL HEALTH CENTER 2026-04-26 05:02 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PHELPS MEMORIAL HEALTH CENTER
CCN 281362 | NE | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $5.7M → Pro Forma $9.3M (+$3.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$69.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$3.6M
Modeled Uplift
$2.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.4M (vs $3.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$839K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$44K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.4M$1.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.3M$38K$1.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$212K$628K$839K$2.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$44K$44K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT77.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$345K$690K$1.0M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$341K$683K$1.0M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$280K$560K$839K$839K$839K$839K$839K
Clean Claim Rate$0$22K$44K$44K$44K$44K$44K$44K
Cumulative$0$988K$2.0M$2.9M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x58% / 9.9x63% / 11.4x67% / 12.8x68% / 13.6x70% / 14.3x
9.0x53% / 8.4x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.7x65% / 12.3x
10.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x
11.0x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.4x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x
12.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.3x
Headroom (turns)
21%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 21% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.2x, adding 3.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.7M$5.7M8.2%
Year 1$5.8M+$2.4M$8.3M12.0%
Year 2$6.0M+$3.6M$9.6M14.0%
Year 3$6.2M+$3.6M$9.8M14.2%
Year 4$6.4M+$3.6M$10.0M14.5%
Year 5$6.6M+$3.6M$10.2M14.8%
$56.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$112.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$55.5M
Value Created
$10.2M
Exit EBITDA
$9.0M
Organic Growth
$36.3M
RCM Value Creation
$10.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$690K$1.0M$1.4M$1.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$683K$1.0M$1.4M$1.6M
A/R Days Reduction$420K$629K$839K$1.0M
Clean Claim Rate$22K$33K$44K$53K
Total$1.8M$2.7M$3.6M$4.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 66 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin8.2%-12.9%-4.8%0.8%
P89
Net-to-Gross58.7%61.2%70.3%77.8%
P20
Occupancy32.4%11.6%18.2%25.7%
P83
Rev/Bed$2.8M$763K$1.3M$1.9M
P91
Exp/Bed$2.5M$789K$1.4M$2.1M
P89

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML