Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 06:38 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
CCN 281359 | NE | 21 beds | Current EBITDA $534K → Pro Forma $2.9M (+$2.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$44.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$534K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$2.4M
Modeled Uplift
$1.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$846K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.5M (vs $2.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$897K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$888K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$546K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$29K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$897K$897K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$863K$25K$888K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$138K$408K$546K$1.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$29K$29K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT78.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$224K$448K$673K$897K$897K$897K$897K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$222K$444K$666K$888K$888K$888K$888K
A/R Days Reduction$0$182K$364K$546K$546K$546K$546K$546K
Clean Claim Rate$0$14K$29K$29K$29K$29K$29K$29K
Cumulative$0$642K$1.3M$1.9M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x106% / 37.5x111% / 42.1x116% / 46.6x118% / 48.9x120% / 51.1x
9.0x101% / 33.0x106% / 37.0x110% / 41.1x112% / 43.1x114% / 45.1x
10.0x97% / 29.4x101% / 33.0x105% / 36.6x107% / 38.4x109% / 40.2x
11.0x92% / 26.4x97% / 29.7x101% / 33.0x103% / 34.6x105% / 36.3x
12.0x89% / 23.9x93% / 27.0x97% / 30.0x99% / 31.5x101% / 33.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.9x
Headroom (turns)
76%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 76% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.6x, adding 6.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$534K$534K1.2%
Year 1$550K+$1.6M$2.1M4.7%
Year 2$567K+$2.4M$2.9M6.5%
Year 3$584K+$2.4M$2.9M6.6%
Year 4$601K+$2.4M$3.0M6.6%
Year 5$619K+$2.4M$3.0M6.6%
$5.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$32.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$27.4M
Value Created
$3.0M
Exit EBITDA
$851K
Organic Growth
$23.6M
RCM Value Creation
$3.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$448K$673K$897K$1.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$444K$666K$888K$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$273K$409K$546K$655K
Clean Claim Rate$14K$22K$29K$34K
Total$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 66 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.2%-13.0%-5.0%0.8%
P76
Net-to-Gross65.6%62.2%71.1%78.8%
P33
Occupancy32.4%11.6%17.6%24.8%
P88
Rev/Bed$2.1M$763K$1.3M$1.8M
P83
Exp/Bed$2.1M$789K$1.4M$1.8M
P80

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML