Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CHERRY COUNTY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:02 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CHERRY COUNTY HOSPITAL
CCN 281344 | NE | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $152K → Pro Forma $1.7M (+$1.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$29.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$152K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$1.6M
Modeled Uplift
$978K
Risk-Adjusted
-$596K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$599K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$593K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$364K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$19K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$599K$599K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$576K$16K$593K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$92K$272K$364K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$19K$19K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT77.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$150K$299K$449K$599K$599K$599K$599K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$148K$296K$444K$593K$593K$593K$593K
A/R Days Reduction$0$121K$243K$364K$364K$364K$364K$364K
Clean Claim Rate$0$10K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K
Cumulative$0$429K$858K$1.3M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x141% / 80.9x146% / 90.2x151% / 99.5x153% / 104.2x156% / 108.9x
9.0x135% / 71.5x140% / 79.8x145% / 88.1x147% / 92.3x149% / 96.4x
10.0x130% / 64.0x135% / 71.5x140% / 79.0x142% / 82.7x144% / 86.5x
11.0x125% / 57.9x130% / 64.7x135% / 71.5x137% / 74.9x139% / 78.3x
12.0x121% / 52.8x126% / 59.0x131% / 65.3x133% / 68.4x135% / 71.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.8x
Headroom (turns)
89%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 89% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.7x, adding 7.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$152K$152K0.5%
Year 1$157K+$1.0M$1.2M4.0%
Year 2$162K+$1.6M$1.7M5.8%
Year 3$166K+$1.6M$1.7M5.8%
Year 4$171K+$1.6M$1.7M5.8%
Year 5$176K+$1.6M$1.8M5.9%
$1.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$19.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$17.7M
Value Created
$1.8M
Exit EBITDA
$242K
Organic Growth
$15.7M
RCM Value Creation
$1.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$299K$449K$599K$718K
Denial Rate Reductio$296K$444K$593K$711K
A/R Days Reduction$182K$273K$364K$437K
Clean Claim Rate$10K$14K$19K$23K
Total$787K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 66 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.5%-12.9%-4.8%0.8%
P71
Net-to-Gross64.1%61.2%70.3%77.8%
P33
Occupancy20.6%11.6%18.2%25.7%
P59
Rev/Bed$1.2M$763K$1.3M$1.9M
P42
Exp/Bed$1.2M$789K$1.4M$2.1M
P39

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML