Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — YORK GENERAL HOSPITAL INC 2026-04-26 05:23 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — YORK GENERAL HOSPITAL INC
CCN 281336 | NE | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-995K → Pro Forma $1.8M (+$2.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$52.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-995K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$2.8M
Modeled Uplift
$1.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.7M (vs $2.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$636K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$33K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.0M$1.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.0M$29K$1.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$160K$476K$636K$2.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$33K$33K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT77.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$261K$523K$784K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$259K$518K$776K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$212K$424K$636K$636K$636K$636K$636K
Clean Claim Rate$0$17K$33K$33K$33K$33K$33K$33K
Cumulative$0$749K$1.5M$2.2M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-4.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
11.3x
Headroom (turns)
174%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 174% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -4.8x, adding 103.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-995K$-995K-1.9%
Year 1$-1.0M+$1.8M$809K1.5%
Year 2$-1.1M+$2.8M$1.7M3.2%
Year 3$-1.1M+$2.8M$1.7M3.2%
Year 4$-1.1M+$2.8M$1.6M3.1%
Year 5$-1.2M+$2.8M$1.6M3.1%
$-10.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$17.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$27.5M
Value Created
$1.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-1.6M
Organic Growth
$27.5M
RCM Value Creation
$1.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$523K$784K$1.0M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$518K$776K$1.0M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$318K$477K$636K$763K
Clean Claim Rate$17K$25K$33K$40K
Total$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$3.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 66 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-1.9%-12.9%-4.8%0.8%
P56
Net-to-Gross63.7%61.2%70.3%77.8%
P32
Occupancy25.7%11.6%18.2%25.7%
P74
Rev/Bed$2.1M$763K$1.3M$1.9M
P79
Exp/Bed$2.1M$789K$1.4M$2.1M
P80

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML