Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BOONE COUNTY HEALTH CENTER 2026-04-26 05:02 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BOONE COUNTY HEALTH CENTER
CCN 281334 | NE | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-90K → Pro Forma $1.9M (+$1.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$37.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-90K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$1.9M
Modeled Uplift
$1.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$709K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.2M (vs $1.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$740K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$732K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$450K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$24K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$740K$740K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$712K$20K$732K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$114K$337K$450K$1.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$24K$24K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT77.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$185K$370K$555K$740K$740K$740K$740K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$183K$366K$549K$732K$732K$732K$732K
A/R Days Reduction$0$150K$300K$450K$450K$450K$450K$450K
Clean Claim Rate$0$12K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K
Cumulative$0$530K$1.1M$1.6M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-0.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
6.9x
Headroom (turns)
106%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 106% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -0.4x, adding 99.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-90K$-90K-0.2%
Year 1$-93K+$1.3M$1.2M3.3%
Year 2$-96K+$1.9M$1.9M5.0%
Year 3$-99K+$1.9M$1.8M5.0%
Year 4$-102K+$1.9M$1.8M5.0%
Year 5$-105K+$1.9M$1.8M5.0%
$-903K
Entry EV (10x)
$20.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$21.2M
Value Created
$1.8M
Exit EBITDA
$-144K
Organic Growth
$19.5M
RCM Value Creation
$1.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$370K$555K$740K$888K
Denial Rate Reductio$366K$549K$732K$879K
A/R Days Reduction$225K$338K$450K$540K
Clean Claim Rate$12K$18K$24K$28K
Total$973K$1.5M$1.9M$2.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 66 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-0.2%-12.9%-4.8%0.8%
P68
Net-to-Gross71.3%61.2%70.3%77.8%
P53
Occupancy25.7%11.6%18.2%25.7%
P73
Rev/Bed$1.5M$763K$1.3M$1.9M
P61
Exp/Bed$1.5M$789K$1.4M$2.1M
P58

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML