Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BUTLER COUNTY HEALTH CARE CENTER 2026-04-26 09:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BUTLER COUNTY HEALTH CARE CENTER
CCN 281332 | NE | 20 beds | Current EBITDA $-307K → Pro Forma $864K (+$1.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$22.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-307K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$864K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$853K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$1.2M
Modeled Uplift
$711K
Risk-Adjusted
-$459K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$445K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$441K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$271K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$14K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$445K$445K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$428K$12K$441K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$68K$202K$271K$853K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$14K$14K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT77.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$111K$222K$334K$445K$445K$445K$445K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$110K$220K$330K$441K$441K$441K$441K
A/R Days Reduction$0$90K$180K$271K$271K$271K$271K$271K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K
Cumulative$0$319K$637K$949K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-3.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
9.5x
Headroom (turns)
146%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 146% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -3.0x, adding 102.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-307K$-307K-1.4%
Year 1$-316K+$780K$464K2.1%
Year 2$-326K+$1.2M$845K3.8%
Year 3$-335K+$1.2M$835K3.8%
Year 4$-345K+$1.2M$825K3.7%
Year 5$-356K+$1.2M$815K3.7%
$-3.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$9.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$12.0M
Value Created
$815K
Exit EBITDA
$-489K
Organic Growth
$11.7M
RCM Value Creation
$815K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$222K$334K$445K$534K
Denial Rate Reductio$220K$330K$441K$529K
A/R Days Reduction$135K$203K$271K$325K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$11K$14K$17K
Total$585K$878K$1.2M$1.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 70 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-1.4%-12.9%-5.3%0.7%
P67
Net-to-Gross76.9%62.9%71.3%77.8%
P67
Occupancy19.0%12.3%17.6%24.8%
P56
Rev/Bed$1.1M$809K$1.3M$1.8M
P39
Exp/Bed$1.1M$834K$1.4M$2.0M
P37

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML