Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MERRICK MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-27 13:32 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MERRICK MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 281328 | NE | 5 beds | Current EBITDA $-3.6M → Pro Forma $-2.5M (+$1.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
EBITDA BRIDGE  ·  CCN 281328

MERRICK MEDICAL CENTER
value-creation walk.

7-lever RCM bridge from current EBITDA to pro-forma — denial / underpay / DAR / coding / contract / cost discipline / cash acceleration. Each lever shows current vs benchmark target with data provenance.

$21.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-3.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-2.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$819K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$1.1M
Modeled Uplift
$749K
Risk-Adjusted
-$374K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$427K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$423K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$260K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$14K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$427K$427K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$411K$12K$423K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$66K$194K$260K$819K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$14K$14K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT62.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$107K$213K$320K$427K$427K$427K$427K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$106K$211K$317K$423K$423K$423K$423K
A/R Days Reduction$0$87K$173K$260K$260K$260K$260K$260K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K
Cumulative$0$306K$612K$911K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-3.6M$-3.6M-17.1%
Year 1$-3.8M+$749K$-3.0M-14.1%
Year 2$-3.9M+$1.1M$-2.7M-12.8%
Year 3$-4.0M+$1.1M$-2.9M-13.4%
Year 4$-4.1M+$1.1M$-3.0M-13.9%
Year 5$-4.2M+$1.1M$-3.1M-14.5%
$-36.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$-34.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$2.3M
Value Created
$-3.1M
Exit EBITDA
$-5.8M
Organic Growth
$11.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-3.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$213K$320K$427K$512K
Denial Rate Reductio$211K$317K$423K$507K
A/R Days Reduction$130K$195K$260K$312K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$10K$14K$16K
Total$562K$842K$1.1M$1.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 50 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-17.1%-35.5%-8.7%4.8%
P34
Net-to-Gross75.3%27.9%46.5%62.1%
P90
Occupancy23.0%11.7%20.0%37.6%
P54
Rev/Bed$4.3M$816K$1.7M$2.7M
P84
Exp/Bed$5.0M$1.2M$1.6M$2.8M
P92

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML