Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CHI HEALTH SCHUYLER 2026-04-26 14:09 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CHI HEALTH SCHUYLER
CCN 281323 | NE | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $128K → Pro Forma $902K (+$774K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$14.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$128K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$774K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$902K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$564K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

58%
Realization (C)
$774K
Modeled Uplift
$449K
Risk-Adjusted
-$326K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 58% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$294K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$291K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$179K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$774K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$294K$294K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$283K$8K$291K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$45K$134K$179K$564K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT77.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$74K$147K$221K$294K$294K$294K$294K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$73K$146K$219K$291K$291K$291K$291K
A/R Days Reduction$0$60K$119K$179K$179K$179K$179K$179K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$211K$422K$628K$774K$774K$774K$774K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $774K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x118% / 49.6x123% / 55.5x128% / 61.4x130% / 64.3x132% / 67.2x
9.0x113% / 43.7x118% / 49.0x122% / 54.2x124% / 56.8x126% / 59.4x
10.0x108% / 39.0x113% / 43.7x117% / 48.4x119% / 50.8x121% / 53.1x
11.0x104% / 35.2x109% / 39.5x113% / 43.7x115% / 45.9x117% / 48.0x
12.0x100% / 32.0x105% / 35.9x109% / 39.8x111% / 41.8x113% / 43.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.3x
Headroom (turns)
82%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 82% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.2x, adding 7.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$128K$128K0.9%
Year 1$131K+$516K$648K4.4%
Year 2$135K+$774K$910K6.2%
Year 3$139K+$774K$914K6.2%
Year 4$144K+$774K$918K6.2%
Year 5$148K+$774K$922K6.3%
$1.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$10.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$8.9M
Value Created
$922K
Exit EBITDA
$203K
Organic Growth
$7.7M
RCM Value Creation
$922K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$147K$221K$294K$353K
Denial Rate Reductio$146K$219K$291K$350K
A/R Days Reduction$90K$134K$179K$215K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$387K$581K$774K$929K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 66 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.9%-12.9%-4.8%0.8%
P74
Net-to-Gross77.2%61.2%70.3%77.8%
P70
Occupancy15.5%11.6%18.2%25.7%
P35
Rev/Bed$588K$763K$1.3M$1.9M
P18
Exp/Bed$583K$789K$1.4M$2.1M
P17

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML