Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — JEFFERSON COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER 2026-04-26 11:55 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — JEFFERSON COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER
CCN 281319 | NE | 17 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.5M → Pro Forma $7K (+$1.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$28.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$7K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$1.5M
Modeled Uplift
$910K
Risk-Adjusted
-$587K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$569K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$563K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$346K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$18K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$569K$569K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$548K$16K$563K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$87K$259K$346K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$18K$18K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT77.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$142K$284K$427K$569K$569K$569K$569K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$141K$282K$422K$563K$563K$563K$563K
A/R Days Reduction$0$115K$231K$346K$346K$346K$346K$346K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K
Cumulative$0$407K$815K$1.2M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-1800.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
1806.9x
Headroom (turns)
27799%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 27799% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -1800.4x, adding 1899.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.5M$-1.5M-5.2%
Year 1$-1.5M+$998K$-536K-1.9%
Year 2$-1.6M+$1.5M$-84K-0.3%
Year 3$-1.6M+$1.5M$-131K-0.5%
Year 4$-1.7M+$1.5M$-180K-0.6%
Year 5$-1.7M+$1.5M$-230K-0.8%
$-14.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$-2.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$12.4M
Value Created
$-230K
Exit EBITDA
$-2.4M
Organic Growth
$15.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-230K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$284K$427K$569K$683K
Denial Rate Reductio$282K$422K$563K$676K
A/R Days Reduction$173K$260K$346K$415K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$14K$18K$22K
Total$748K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 70 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-5.2%-12.9%-5.3%0.7%
P50
Net-to-Gross71.0%62.9%71.3%77.8%
P47
Occupancy13.7%12.3%17.6%24.8%
P29
Rev/Bed$1.7M$809K$1.3M$1.8M
P67
Exp/Bed$1.8M$834K$1.4M$2.0M
P71

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML