Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KEARNEY COUNTY HEALTH SERVICES 2026-04-27 08:36 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KEARNEY COUNTY HEALTH SERVICES
CCN 281306 | NE | 10 beds | Current EBITDA $-691K → Pro Forma $116K (+$807K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
EBITDA BRIDGE  ·  CCN 281306

KEARNEY COUNTY HEALTH SERVICES
value-creation walk.

7-lever RCM bridge from current EBITDA to pro-forma — denial / underpay / DAR / coding / contract / cost discipline / cash acceleration. Each lever shows current vs benchmark target with data provenance.

$15.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-691K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$807K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$116K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$589K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$807K
Modeled Uplift
$532K
Risk-Adjusted
-$275K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$307K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$304K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$187K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$807K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$307K$307K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$295K$8K$304K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$47K$140K$187K$589K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT80.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$77K$153K$230K$307K$307K$307K$307K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$76K$152K$228K$304K$304K$304K$304K
A/R Days Reduction$0$62K$125K$187K$187K$187K$187K$187K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$220K$440K$655K$807K$807K$807K$807K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $807K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-50.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
56.7x
Headroom (turns)
873%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 873% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -50.2x, adding 149.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-691K$-691K-4.5%
Year 1$-712K+$538K$-173K-1.1%
Year 2$-733K+$807K$74K0.5%
Year 3$-755K+$807K$52K0.3%
Year 4$-778K+$807K$30K0.2%
Year 5$-801K+$807K$6K0.0%
$-6.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$70K
Exit EV (11x)
$7.0M
Value Created
$6K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.1M
Organic Growth
$8.1M
RCM Value Creation
$6K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$153K$230K$307K$368K
Denial Rate Reductio$152K$228K$304K$365K
A/R Days Reduction$93K$140K$187K$224K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$404K$606K$807K$969K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 43 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-4.5%-13.7%-7.7%-1.6%
P65
Net-to-Gross69.9%69.3%72.7%80.7%
P28
Occupancy31.4%10.2%15.9%20.4%
P93
Rev/Bed$1.5M$767K$1.2M$1.7M
P67
Exp/Bed$1.6M$831K$1.3M$1.9M
P67

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML