Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BELLEVUE MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BELLEVUE MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 280132 | NE | 69 beds | Current EBITDA $12.6M → Pro Forma $18.5M (+$5.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$112.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$12.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$18.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$5.9M
Modeled Uplift
$4.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.3M (vs $5.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$72K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.3M$2.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.2M$62K$2.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$346K$1.0M$1.4M$4.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$72K$72K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$564K$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$558K$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$457K$915K$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$36K$72K$72K$72K$72K$72K$72K
Cumulative$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.8M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x54% / 8.7x58% / 10.0x62% / 11.3x64% / 12.0x66% / 12.7x
9.0x49% / 7.3x54% / 8.5x58% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x
10.0x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x
11.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x
12.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.7x
Headroom (turns)
12%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 12% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.8x, adding 2.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$12.6M$12.6M11.2%
Year 1$13.0M+$4.0M$16.9M15.0%
Year 2$13.4M+$5.9M$19.3M17.1%
Year 3$13.8M+$5.9M$19.7M17.5%
Year 4$14.2M+$5.9M$20.1M17.8%
Year 5$14.6M+$5.9M$20.5M18.2%
$125.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$225.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$99.9M
Value Created
$20.5M
Exit EBITDA
$20.0M
Organic Growth
$59.3M
RCM Value Creation
$20.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.7M
A/R Days Reduction$686K$1.0M$1.4M$1.6M
Clean Claim Rate$36K$54K$72K$87K
Total$3.0M$4.5M$5.9M$7.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 19 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin11.2%-11.7%-8.8%5.5%
P89
Net-to-Gross25.4%30.0%37.4%42.5%
P5
Occupancy69.0%41.2%46.7%60.8%
P84
Rev/Bed$1.6M$1.4M$1.8M$2.6M
P42
Exp/Bed$1.5M$1.4M$2.0M$2.7M
P32

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML