Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LINCOLN SURGICAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LINCOLN SURGICAL HOSPITAL
CCN 280127 | NE | 20 beds | Current EBITDA $15.3M → Pro Forma $19.5M (+$4.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$80.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$15.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$19.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$4.3M
Modeled Uplift
$2.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.6M (vs $4.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$985K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$52K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.6M$1.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.6M$45K$1.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$248K$737K$985K$3.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$52K$52K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT77.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$405K$809K$1.2M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$401K$801K$1.2M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$328K$657K$985K$985K$985K$985K$985K
Clean Claim Rate$0$26K$52K$52K$52K$52K$52K$52K
Cumulative$0$1.2M$2.3M$3.5M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x
9.0x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x
10.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x50% / 7.5x51% / 8.0x
11.0x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.5x47% / 7.0x
12.0x30% / 3.8x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.1x
Headroom (turns)
-2%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -2% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.6x, adding 1.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$15.3M$15.3M18.8%
Year 1$15.7M+$2.8M$18.6M22.9%
Year 2$16.2M+$4.3M$20.4M25.3%
Year 3$16.7M+$4.3M$20.9M25.9%
Year 4$17.2M+$4.3M$21.4M26.5%
Year 5$17.7M+$4.3M$21.9M27.1%
$152.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$241.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$88.8M
Value Created
$21.9M
Exit EBITDA
$24.3M
Organic Growth
$42.6M
RCM Value Creation
$21.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$809K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$801K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M
A/R Days Reduction$492K$739K$985K$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$26K$39K$52K$62K
Total$2.1M$3.2M$4.3M$5.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 70 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin18.8%-12.9%-5.3%0.7%
P93
Net-to-Gross46.5%62.9%71.3%77.8%
P7
Occupancy5.0%12.3%17.6%24.8%
P6
Rev/Bed$4.0M$809K$1.3M$1.8M
P97
Exp/Bed$3.3M$834K$1.4M$2.0M
P93

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML