Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CHI HEALTH IMMANUEL 2026-04-26 05:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CHI HEALTH IMMANUEL
CCN 280081 | NE | 177 beds | Current EBITDA $-16.6M → Pro Forma $-6.7M (+$9.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$187.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-16.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$9.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-6.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$7.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$9.9M
Modeled Uplift
$6.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $6.7M (vs $9.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$120K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$9.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.8M$3.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.6M$103K$3.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$576K$1.7M$2.3M$7.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$120K$120K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$939K$1.9M$2.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$930K$1.9M$2.8M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$762K$1.5M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$60K$120K$120K$120K$120K$120K$120K
Cumulative$0$2.7M$5.4M$8.0M$9.9M$9.9M$9.9M$9.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $9.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-16.6M$-16.6M-8.8%
Year 1$-17.1M+$6.6M$-10.5M-5.6%
Year 2$-17.6M+$9.9M$-7.7M-4.1%
Year 3$-18.1M+$9.9M$-8.2M-4.4%
Year 4$-18.7M+$9.9M$-8.8M-4.7%
Year 5$-19.2M+$9.9M$-9.3M-5.0%
$-165.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-102.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$63.1M
Value Created
$-9.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-26.4M
Organic Growth
$98.8M
RCM Value Creation
$-9.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.9M$2.8M$3.8M$4.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.9M$2.8M$3.7M$4.5M
A/R Days Reduction$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.7M
Clean Claim Rate$60K$90K$120K$144K
Total$4.9M$7.4M$9.9M$11.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 12 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-8.8%-13.1%-9.3%-1.5%
P58
Net-to-Gross25.0%29.4%30.9%38.8%
P0
Occupancy58.0%42.9%53.9%58.7%
P67
Rev/Bed$1.1M$1.1M$1.6M$1.9M
P17
Exp/Bed$1.2M$1.3M$1.4M$2.1M
P17

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML