Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CHI HEALTH CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY BERG 2026-04-26 05:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CHI HEALTH CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY BERG
CCN 280060 | NE | 389 beds | Current EBITDA $-25.0M → Pro Forma $4.3M (+$29.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$557.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-25.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$29.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$21.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$29.3M
Modeled Uplift
$20.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$9.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $20.2M (vs $29.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$11.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$11.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$357K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$29.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$11.2M$11.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$10.7M$307K$11.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.7M$5.1M$6.8M$21.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$357K$357K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.8M$5.6M$8.4M$11.2M$11.2M$11.2M$11.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.8M$5.5M$8.3M$11.0M$11.0M$11.0M$11.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.3M$4.5M$6.8M$6.8M$6.8M$6.8M$6.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$179K$357K$357K$357K$357K$357K$357K
Cumulative$0$8.0M$16.0M$23.8M$29.3M$29.3M$29.3M$29.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $29.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-49.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
55.8x
Headroom (turns)
858%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 858% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -49.3x, adding 148.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-25.0M$-25.0M-4.5%
Year 1$-25.8M+$19.6M$-6.2M-1.1%
Year 2$-26.6M+$29.3M$2.8M0.5%
Year 3$-27.4M+$29.3M$2.0M0.4%
Year 4$-28.2M+$29.3M$1.2M0.2%
Year 5$-29.0M+$29.3M$311K0.1%
$-250.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$3.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$253.9M
Value Created
$311K
Exit EBITDA
$-39.9M
Organic Growth
$293.5M
RCM Value Creation
$311K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.6M$8.4M$11.2M$13.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.5M$8.3M$11.0M$13.3M
A/R Days Reduction$3.4M$5.1M$6.8M$8.1M
Clean Claim Rate$179K$268K$357K$428K
Total$14.7M$22.0M$29.3M$35.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 1201 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-4.5%-13.1%-3.7%5.0%
P47
Net-to-Gross26.6%18.7%25.1%32.7%
P55
Occupancy70.0%59.3%70.7%79.0%
P48
Rev/Bed$1.4M$1.2M$1.5M$2.1M
P43
Exp/Bed$1.5M$1.1M$1.6M$2.2M
P46

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML