Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CHI HEALTH ST. ELIZABETH 2026-04-26 06:39 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CHI HEALTH ST. ELIZABETH
CCN 280020 | NE | 137 beds | Current EBITDA $-22.4M → Pro Forma $-13.8M (+$8.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$163.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-22.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$8.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-13.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$6.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$8.6M
Modeled Uplift
$5.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.9M (vs $8.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$105K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$8.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.3M$3.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.1M$90K$3.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$502K$1.5M$2.0M$6.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$105K$105K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT39.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$818K$1.6M$2.5M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$810K$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$663K$1.3M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$52K$105K$105K$105K$105K$105K$105K
Cumulative$0$2.3M$4.7M$7.0M$8.6M$8.6M$8.6M$8.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $8.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-22.4M$-22.4M-13.7%
Year 1$-23.1M+$5.7M$-17.4M-10.6%
Year 2$-23.8M+$8.6M$-15.2M-9.3%
Year 3$-24.5M+$8.6M$-15.9M-9.7%
Year 4$-25.2M+$8.6M$-16.6M-10.2%
Year 5$-26.0M+$8.6M$-17.4M-10.6%
$-224.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$-191.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$33.0M
Value Created
$-17.4M
Exit EBITDA
$-35.7M
Organic Growth
$86.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-17.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.6M$2.5M$3.3M$3.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.9M
A/R Days Reduction$995K$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M
Clean Claim Rate$52K$79K$105K$126K
Total$4.3M$6.5M$8.6M$10.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 14 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-13.7%-12.3%-8.9%2.1%
P14
Net-to-Gross29.6%29.1%30.9%39.2%
P29
Occupancy60.8%43.8%53.9%60.1%
P71
Rev/Bed$1.2M$1.2M$1.6M$2.0M
P29
Exp/Bed$1.4M$1.4M$1.5M$2.2M
P29

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML