Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — DANIELS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:15 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — DANIELS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 271342 | MT | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-435K → Pro Forma $125K (+$560K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$10.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-435K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$560K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$125K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+531bps
Margin Improvement
$405K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$560K
Modeled Uplift
$395K
Risk-Adjusted
-$166K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$211K
+200bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$211K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$128K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+9bp
Total EBITDA Impact$560K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$203K$8K$211K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$211K$211K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$32K$96K$128K$405K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT87.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$53K$106K$159K$211K$211K$211K$211K
Cost to Collect$0$53K$106K$158K$211K$211K$211K$211K
A/R Days Reduction$0$43K$86K$128K$128K$128K$128K$128K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$153K$306K$455K$560K$560K$560K$560K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $560K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-29.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
35.8x
Headroom (turns)
551%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 551% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -29.3x, adding 128.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-435K$-435K-4.1%
Year 1$-448K+$374K$-74K-0.7%
Year 2$-461K+$560K$99K0.9%
Year 3$-475K+$560K$85K0.8%
Year 4$-490K+$560K$71K0.7%
Year 5$-504K+$560K$56K0.5%
$-4.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$618K
Exit EV (11x)
$5.0M
Value Created
$56K
Exit EBITDA
$-693K
Organic Growth
$5.6M
RCM Value Creation
$56K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$106K$159K$211K$254K
Cost to Collect$106K$158K$211K$253K
A/R Days Reduction$64K$96K$128K$154K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$280K$420K$560K$673K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 49 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-4.1%-20.4%-9.1%-1.4%
P68
Net-to-Gross87.8%63.3%72.9%87.7%
P74
Occupancy70.7%22.7%55.9%73.2%
P69
Rev/Bed$422K$365K$709K$1.9M
P32
Exp/Bed$439K$419K$953K$2.2M
P29

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML