Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — NORTHEAST MONTANA HEALTH SERVICES 2026-04-26 05:24 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — NORTHEAST MONTANA HEALTH SERVICES
CCN 271341 | MT | 22 beds | Current EBITDA $-3.6M → Pro Forma $-1.8M (+$1.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$35.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-3.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-1.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$1.9M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$725K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$707K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$700K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$430K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$23K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$707K$707K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$681K$19K$700K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$109K$322K$430K$1.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$23K$23K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT87.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$177K$354K$530K$707K$707K$707K$707K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$175K$350K$525K$700K$700K$700K$700K
A/R Days Reduction$0$143K$287K$430K$430K$430K$430K$430K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$23K$23K$23K$23K$23K$23K
Cumulative$0$507K$1.0M$1.5M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-3.6M$-3.6M-10.2%
Year 1$-3.7M+$1.2M$-2.5M-7.0%
Year 2$-3.8M+$1.9M$-2.0M-5.6%
Year 3$-3.9M+$1.9M$-2.1M-5.9%
Year 4$-4.1M+$1.9M$-2.2M-6.2%
Year 5$-4.2M+$1.9M$-2.3M-6.6%
$-36.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$-25.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$10.5M
Value Created
$-2.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-5.8M
Organic Growth
$18.6M
RCM Value Creation
$-2.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$354K$530K$707K$849K
Denial Rate Reductio$350K$525K$700K$840K
A/R Days Reduction$215K$323K$430K$516K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$17K$23K$27K
Total$930K$1.4M$1.9M$2.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 48 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-10.2%-20.8%-9.3%-1.3%
P37
Net-to-Gross74.2%63.9%73.2%87.8%
P54
Occupancy14.8%23.1%56.3%73.2%
P15
Rev/Bed$1.6M$357K$673K$1.9M
P63
Exp/Bed$1.8M$411K$909K$2.2M
P60

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML