Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BIG HORN HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:13 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BIG HORN HOSPITAL
CCN 271338 | MT | 18 beds | Current EBITDA $-6.3M → Pro Forma $-5.6M (+$674K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$12.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-6.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$674K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-5.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+528bps
Margin Improvement
$489K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$674K
Modeled Uplift
$464K
Risk-Adjusted
-$210K
Execution Discount
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$255K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$254K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$155K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+8bp
Total EBITDA Impact$674K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$255K$255K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$246K$8K$254K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$39K$116K$155K$489K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT88.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$64K$128K$191K$255K$255K$255K$255K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$63K$127K$190K$254K$254K$254K$254K
A/R Days Reduction$0$52K$104K$155K$155K$155K$155K$155K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$184K$368K$547K$674K$674K$674K$674K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $674K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-6.3M$-6.3M-49.5%
Year 1$-6.5M+$449K$-6.1M-47.5%
Year 2$-6.7M+$674K$-6.0M-47.3%
Year 3$-6.9M+$674K$-6.2M-48.9%
Year 4$-7.1M+$674K$-6.4M-50.5%
Year 5$-7.3M+$674K$-6.7M-52.2%
$-63.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$-73.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$-10.0M
Value Created
$-6.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-10.1M
Organic Growth
$6.7M
RCM Value Creation
$-6.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$128K$191K$255K$306K
Denial Rate Reductio$127K$190K$254K$305K
A/R Days Reduction$78K$116K$155K$186K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$337K$505K$674K$809K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 49 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-49.5%-21.6%-9.5%-2.7%
P2
Net-to-Gross88.7%63.3%73.4%88.3%
P74
Occupancy56.8%23.2%52.3%71.2%
P53
Rev/Bed$709K$365K$760K$1.9M
P47
Exp/Bed$1.1M$419K$960K$2.2M
P51

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML