Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF ANACONDA 2026-04-26 14:15 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF ANACONDA
CCN 271335 | MT | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $1.1M → Pro Forma $5.8M (+$4.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$89.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$4.7M
Modeled Uplift
$3.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.4M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.3M (vs $4.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$57K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.8M$1.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.7M$49K$1.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$273K$810K$1.1M$3.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$57K$57K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT87.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$445K$890K$1.3M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$440K$881K$1.3M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$361K$722K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$28K$57K$57K$57K$57K$57K$57K
Cumulative$0$1.3M$2.5M$3.8M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x105% / 36.0x109% / 40.3x114% / 44.7x116% / 46.9x118% / 49.0x
9.0x100% / 31.6x104% / 35.5x108% / 39.3x110% / 41.3x112% / 43.2x
10.0x95% / 28.1x100% / 31.6x104% / 35.1x106% / 36.8x108% / 38.6x
11.0x91% / 25.3x95% / 28.4x100% / 31.6x101% / 33.2x103% / 34.8x
12.0x87% / 22.9x92% / 25.8x96% / 28.7x98% / 30.1x100% / 31.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.9x
Headroom (turns)
75%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 75% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.6x, adding 6.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.1M$1.1M1.3%
Year 1$1.1M+$3.1M$4.3M4.8%
Year 2$1.2M+$4.7M$5.9M6.6%
Year 3$1.2M+$4.7M$5.9M6.6%
Year 4$1.3M+$4.7M$5.9M6.7%
Year 5$1.3M+$4.7M$6.0M6.7%
$11.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$65.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$54.5M
Value Created
$6.0M
Exit EBITDA
$1.8M
Organic Growth
$46.8M
RCM Value Creation
$6.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$890K$1.3M$1.8M$2.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$881K$1.3M$1.8M$2.1M
A/R Days Reduction$541K$812K$1.1M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$28K$43K$57K$68K
Total$2.3M$3.5M$4.7M$5.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 49 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.3%-20.4%-9.1%-1.4%
P79
Net-to-Gross57.5%63.3%72.9%87.7%
P17
Occupancy44.9%22.7%55.9%73.2%
P43
Rev/Bed$3.6M$365K$709K$1.9M
P87
Exp/Bed$3.5M$419K$953K$2.2M
P90

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML