Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LOGAN HEALTH SHELBY 2026-04-26 14:08 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LOGAN HEALTH SHELBY
CCN 271328 | MT | 21 beds | Current EBITDA $-2.8M → Pro Forma $-2.1M (+$663K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$12.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-2.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$663K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-2.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+528bps
Margin Improvement
$482K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

59%
Realization (C)
$663K
Modeled Uplift
$392K
Risk-Adjusted
-$271K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 59% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$251K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$250K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$153K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+8bp
Total EBITDA Impact$663K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$251K$251K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$242K$8K$250K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$39K$114K$153K$482K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT87.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$63K$126K$188K$251K$251K$251K$251K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$62K$125K$187K$250K$250K$250K$250K
A/R Days Reduction$0$51K$102K$153K$153K$153K$153K$153K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$181K$362K$538K$663K$663K$663K$663K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $663K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-2.8M$-2.8M-22.0%
Year 1$-2.8M+$442K$-2.4M-19.1%
Year 2$-2.9M+$663K$-2.3M-18.0%
Year 3$-3.0M+$663K$-2.4M-18.7%
Year 4$-3.1M+$663K$-2.4M-19.5%
Year 5$-3.2M+$663K$-2.5M-20.2%
$-27.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$-27.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$-301K
Value Created
$-2.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-4.4M
Organic Growth
$6.6M
RCM Value Creation
$-2.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$126K$188K$251K$301K
Denial Rate Reductio$125K$187K$250K$300K
A/R Days Reduction$76K$115K$153K$183K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$332K$498K$663K$796K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 48 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-22.0%-20.8%-9.3%-1.3%
P22
Net-to-Gross74.9%63.9%73.2%87.8%
P59
Occupancy7.7%23.1%56.3%73.2%
P2
Rev/Bed$598K$357K$673K$1.9M
P43
Exp/Bed$729K$411K$909K$2.2M
P46

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML