Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BEARTOOTH BILLINGS CLINIC 2026-04-26 14:15 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BEARTOOTH BILLINGS CLINIC
CCN 271326 | MT | 10 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.2M → Pro Forma $-251K (+$967K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$18.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$967K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-251K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$705K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$967K
Modeled Uplift
$653K
Risk-Adjusted
-$315K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$368K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$364K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$224K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$12K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$967K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$368K$368K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$354K$10K$364K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$56K$167K$224K$705K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$12K$12K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT72.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$92K$184K$276K$368K$368K$368K$368K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$91K$182K$273K$364K$364K$364K$364K
A/R Days Reduction$0$75K$149K$224K$224K$224K$224K$224K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K
Cumulative$0$263K$527K$784K$967K$967K$967K$967K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $967K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.2M$-1.2M-6.6%
Year 1$-1.3M+$645K$-610K-3.3%
Year 2$-1.3M+$967K$-325K-1.8%
Year 3$-1.3M+$967K$-363K-2.0%
Year 4$-1.4M+$967K$-403K-2.2%
Year 5$-1.4M+$967K$-444K-2.4%
$-12.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$-4.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$7.3M
Value Created
$-444K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.9M
Organic Growth
$9.7M
RCM Value Creation
$-444K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$184K$276K$368K$441K
Denial Rate Reductio$182K$273K$364K$437K
A/R Days Reduction$112K$168K$224K$269K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$12K$14K
Total$484K$726K$967K$1.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 14 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-6.6%-18.3%-9.3%-2.8%
P64
Net-to-Gross58.9%55.5%65.1%72.2%
P36
Occupancy45.6%13.6%24.7%43.2%
P71
Rev/Bed$1.8M$769K$962K$1.8M
P71
Exp/Bed$2.0M$955K$1.4M$1.9M
P71

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML