Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CLARK FORK VALLEY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:35 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CLARK FORK VALLEY HOSPITAL
CCN 271323 | MT | 16 beds | Current EBITDA $-3.8M → Pro Forma $-2.4M (+$1.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$25.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-3.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-2.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$994K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$1.4M
Modeled Uplift
$876K
Risk-Adjusted
-$487K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$518K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$513K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$315K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$17K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$518K$518K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$499K$14K$513K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$80K$236K$315K$994K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$17K$17K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT88.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$130K$259K$389K$518K$518K$518K$518K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$128K$256K$385K$513K$513K$513K$513K
A/R Days Reduction$0$105K$210K$315K$315K$315K$315K$315K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K
Cumulative$0$371K$742K$1.1M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-3.8M$-3.8M-14.6%
Year 1$-3.9M+$909K$-3.0M-11.6%
Year 2$-4.0M+$1.4M$-2.7M-10.3%
Year 3$-4.1M+$1.4M$-2.8M-10.7%
Year 4$-4.3M+$1.4M$-2.9M-11.2%
Year 5$-4.4M+$1.4M$-3.0M-11.7%
$-37.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$-33.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$4.6M
Value Created
$-3.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-6.0M
Organic Growth
$13.6M
RCM Value Creation
$-3.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$259K$389K$518K$622K
Denial Rate Reductio$256K$385K$513K$616K
A/R Days Reduction$158K$236K$315K$378K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$12K$17K$20K
Total$682K$1.0M$1.4M$1.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 48 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-14.6%-21.8%-9.5%-3.9%
P35
Net-to-Gross57.7%63.9%73.7%88.5%
P15
Occupancy32.5%23.1%51.5%71.7%
P33
Rev/Bed$1.6M$357K$779K$1.9M
P63
Exp/Bed$1.9M$432K$1.0M$2.2M
P65

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML