Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MCCONE COUNTY HEALTH CENTER 2026-04-26 15:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MCCONE COUNTY HEALTH CENTER
CCN 271305 | MT | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-189K → Pro Forma $83K (+$272K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$4.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-189K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$272K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$83K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+550bps
Margin Improvement
$190K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$272K
Modeled Uplift
$189K
Risk-Adjusted
-$83K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.2M (vs $0.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$103K
+209bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$99K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$60K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+19bp
Total EBITDA Impact$272K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$95K$8K$103K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$99K$99K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$15K$45K$60K$190K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT87.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$26K$52K$78K$103K$103K$103K$103K
Cost to Collect$0$25K$49K$74K$99K$99K$99K$99K
A/R Days Reduction$0$20K$40K$60K$60K$60K$60K$60K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$75K$151K$222K$272K$272K$272K$272K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $272K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-19.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
25.7x
Headroom (turns)
396%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 396% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -19.2x, adding 118.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-189K$-189K-3.8%
Year 1$-195K+$181K$-13K-0.3%
Year 2$-201K+$272K$72K1.4%
Year 3$-207K+$272K$66K1.3%
Year 4$-213K+$272K$59K1.2%
Year 5$-219K+$272K$53K1.1%
$-1.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$583K
Exit EV (11x)
$2.5M
Value Created
$53K
Exit EBITDA
$-301K
Organic Growth
$2.7M
RCM Value Creation
$53K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$52K$78K$103K$124K
Cost to Collect$49K$74K$99K$119K
A/R Days Reduction$30K$45K$60K$72K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$136K$204K$272K$327K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 49 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.8%-20.4%-9.1%-1.4%
P70
Net-to-Gross86.2%63.3%72.9%87.7%
P70
Occupancy73.2%22.7%55.9%73.2%
P73
Rev/Bed$198K$365K$709K$1.9M
P6
Exp/Bed$205K$419K$953K$2.2M
P4

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML