Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BOZEMAN DEACONESS HEALTH SERVICES 2026-04-26 09:06 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BOZEMAN DEACONESS HEALTH SERVICES
CCN 270057 | MT | 124 beds | Current EBITDA $-51.6M → Pro Forma $-30.8M (+$20.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$395.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-51.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$20.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-30.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$15.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$20.8M
Modeled Uplift
$14.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.1M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $14.8M (vs $20.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$253K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$20.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.9M$7.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.6M$218K$7.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.2M$3.6M$4.8M$15.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$253K$253K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.0M$4.0M$5.9M$7.9M$7.9M$7.9M$7.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.0M$3.9M$5.9M$7.8M$7.8M$7.8M$7.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$127K$253K$253K$253K$253K$253K$253K
Cumulative$0$5.7M$11.3M$16.9M$20.8M$20.8M$20.8M$20.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $20.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-51.6M$-51.6M-13.0%
Year 1$-53.1M+$13.9M$-39.3M-9.9%
Year 2$-54.7M+$20.8M$-33.9M-8.6%
Year 3$-56.4M+$20.8M$-35.6M-9.0%
Year 4$-58.1M+$20.8M$-37.2M-9.4%
Year 5$-59.8M+$20.8M$-39.0M-9.9%
$-515.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-428.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$87.0M
Value Created
$-39.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-82.2M
Organic Growth
$208.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-39.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.0M$5.9M$7.9M$9.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.9M$5.9M$7.8M$9.4M
A/R Days Reduction$2.4M$3.6M$4.8M$5.8M
Clean Claim Rate$127K$190K$253K$304K
Total$10.4M$15.6M$20.8M$25.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 8 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-13.0%-13.8%-9.3%-2.7%
P25
Net-to-Gross52.8%39.7%45.3%49.2%
P75
Occupancy58.4%54.9%60.2%69.4%
P38
Rev/Bed$3.2M$1.9M$2.3M$2.5M
P88
Exp/Bed$3.6M$1.9M$2.6M$2.7M
P88

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML