Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BENEFIS HOSPITALS INC. 2026-04-26 05:24 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BENEFIS HOSPITALS INC.
CCN 270012 | MT | 312 beds | Current EBITDA $-28.2M → Pro Forma $-384K (+$27.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$528.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-28.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$27.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-384K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$20.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$27.8M
Modeled Uplift
$18.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$9.6M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %. Risks: Bed Count, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $18.2M (vs $27.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$10.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$10.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$338K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$27.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$10.6M$10.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$10.2M$290K$10.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.6M$4.8M$6.4M$20.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$338K$338K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT33.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.6M$5.3M$7.9M$10.6M$10.6M$10.6M$10.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.6M$5.2M$7.8M$10.5M$10.5M$10.5M$10.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.1M$4.3M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$169K$338K$338K$338K$338K$338K$338K
Cumulative$0$7.6M$15.1M$22.5M$27.8M$27.8M$27.8M$27.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $27.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-28.2M$-28.2M-5.3%
Year 1$-29.0M+$18.5M$-10.5M-2.0%
Year 2$-29.9M+$27.8M$-2.1M-0.4%
Year 3$-30.8M+$27.8M$-3.0M-0.6%
Year 4$-31.7M+$27.8M$-3.9M-0.7%
Year 5$-32.7M+$27.8M$-4.9M-0.9%
$-281.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$-53.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$228.1M
Value Created
$-4.9M
Exit EBITDA
$-44.9M
Organic Growth
$277.8M
RCM Value Creation
$-4.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.3M$7.9M$10.6M$12.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.2M$7.8M$10.5M$12.5M
A/R Days Reduction$3.2M$4.8M$6.4M$7.7M
Clean Claim Rate$169K$253K$338K$406K
Total$13.9M$20.8M$27.8M$33.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 1459 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-5.3%-13.3%-3.8%5.8%
P45
Net-to-Gross39.6%18.5%25.4%33.3%
P85
Occupancy48.1%56.5%68.9%77.8%
P13
Rev/Bed$1.7M$1.1M$1.5M$2.0M
P63
Exp/Bed$1.8M$1.0M$1.5M$2.1M
P66

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML