Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. PETERS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:24 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. PETERS HOSPITAL
CCN 270003 | MT | 125 beds | Current EBITDA $-31.2M → Pro Forma $-16.0M (+$15.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$289.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-31.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$15.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-16.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$11.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$15.2M
Modeled Uplift
$10.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.6M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $10.6M (vs $15.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$185K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$15.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.8M$5.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.6M$159K$5.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$888K$2.6M$3.5M$11.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$185K$185K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.4M$2.9M$4.3M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.4M$2.9M$4.3M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.2M$2.3M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$93K$185K$185K$185K$185K$185K$185K
Cumulative$0$4.1M$8.3M$12.3M$15.2M$15.2M$15.2M$15.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $15.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-31.2M$-31.2M-10.8%
Year 1$-32.2M+$10.1M$-22.0M-7.6%
Year 2$-33.1M+$15.2M$-17.9M-6.2%
Year 3$-34.1M+$15.2M$-18.9M-6.5%
Year 4$-35.1M+$15.2M$-19.9M-6.9%
Year 5$-36.2M+$15.2M$-21.0M-7.2%
$-312.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$-230.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$81.5M
Value Created
$-21.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-49.7M
Organic Growth
$152.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-21.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.9M$4.3M$5.8M$6.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.9M$4.3M$5.7M$6.9M
A/R Days Reduction$1.8M$2.6M$3.5M$4.2M
Clean Claim Rate$93K$139K$185K$222K
Total$7.6M$11.4M$15.2M$18.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 8 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-10.8%-13.8%-9.3%-2.7%
P38
Net-to-Gross46.5%39.7%45.3%49.2%
P50
Occupancy56.8%54.9%60.2%69.4%
P25
Rev/Bed$2.3M$1.9M$2.3M$2.5M
P38
Exp/Bed$2.6M$1.9M$2.6M$2.7M
P38

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML