Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CENTERPOINTE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 08:02 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CENTERPOINTE HOSPITAL
CCN 264012 | MO | 104 beds | Current EBITDA $689K → Pro Forma $2.7M (+$2.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$37.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$689K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$2.0M
Modeled Uplift
$1.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$565K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.4M (vs $2.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$752K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$744K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$457K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$24K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$752K$752K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$724K$21K$744K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$115K$342K$457K$1.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$24K$24K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$188K$376K$564K$752K$752K$752K$752K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$186K$372K$558K$744K$744K$744K$744K
A/R Days Reduction$0$152K$305K$457K$457K$457K$457K$457K
Clean Claim Rate$0$12K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K
Cumulative$0$539K$1.1M$1.6M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x92% / 26.2x97% / 29.5x101% / 32.8x103% / 34.4x105% / 36.0x
9.0x87% / 22.9x92% / 25.9x96% / 28.8x98% / 30.2x100% / 31.7x
10.0x83% / 20.3x87% / 22.9x91% / 25.6x93% / 26.9x95% / 28.2x
11.0x79% / 18.2x83% / 20.6x87% / 22.9x89% / 24.1x91% / 25.3x
12.0x75% / 16.4x79% / 18.6x83% / 20.8x85% / 21.9x87% / 22.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.3x
Headroom (turns)
66%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 66% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.2x, adding 6.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$689K$689K1.8%
Year 1$710K+$1.3M$2.0M5.4%
Year 2$731K+$2.0M$2.7M7.2%
Year 3$753K+$2.0M$2.7M7.3%
Year 4$775K+$2.0M$2.8M7.3%
Year 5$799K+$2.0M$2.8M7.4%
$6.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$30.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$23.6M
Value Created
$2.8M
Exit EBITDA
$1.1M
Organic Growth
$19.8M
RCM Value Creation
$2.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$376K$564K$752K$902K
Denial Rate Reductio$372K$558K$744K$893K
A/R Days Reduction$229K$343K$457K$549K
Clean Claim Rate$12K$18K$24K$29K
Total$989K$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 40 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.8%-11.0%-0.2%12.2%
P55
Net-to-Gross40.9%23.3%29.0%42.0%
P72
Occupancy79.9%46.2%64.1%74.7%
P85
Rev/Bed$361K$412K$1.2M$1.5M
P18
Exp/Bed$355K$534K$1.2M$1.6M
P12

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML