Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — RANKEN JORDAN 2026-04-26 11:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — RANKEN JORDAN
CCN 263303 | MO | 60 beds | Current EBITDA $15.0M → Pro Forma $18.5M (+$3.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$67.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$15.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$18.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$3.5M
Modeled Uplift
$2.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.5M (vs $3.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$819K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$43K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.3M$1.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.3M$37K$1.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$207K$612K$819K$2.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$43K$43K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT40.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$337K$673K$1.0M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$333K$666K$999K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$273K$546K$819K$819K$819K$819K$819K
Clean Claim Rate$0$22K$43K$43K$43K$43K$43K$43K
Cumulative$0$964K$1.9M$2.9M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x
9.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x
10.0x38% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x
11.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.7x
12.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.3x38% / 5.1x40% / 5.5x42% / 5.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.3x
Headroom (turns)
-5%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -5% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.8x, adding 1.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$15.0M$15.0M22.2%
Year 1$15.4M+$2.4M$17.8M26.4%
Year 2$15.9M+$3.5M$19.4M28.8%
Year 3$16.3M+$3.5M$19.9M29.6%
Year 4$16.8M+$3.5M$20.4M30.3%
Year 5$17.3M+$3.5M$20.9M31.0%
$149.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$229.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$80.1M
Value Created
$20.9M
Exit EBITDA
$23.8M
Organic Growth
$35.4M
RCM Value Creation
$20.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$673K$1.0M$1.3M$1.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$666K$999K$1.3M$1.6M
A/R Days Reduction$409K$614K$819K$983K
Clean Claim Rate$22K$32K$43K$52K
Total$1.8M$2.7M$3.5M$4.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 51 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin22.2%-16.3%-7.1%8.7%
P90
Net-to-Gross82.7%25.8%33.2%40.5%
P94
Occupancy79.9%42.4%59.0%74.8%
P80
Rev/Bed$1.1M$383K$1.1M$1.6M
P51
Exp/Bed$872K$425K$995K$1.7M
P43

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML