Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. LOUIS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. LOUIS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL
CCN 263301 | MO | 445 beds | Current EBITDA $56.6M → Pro Forma $103.3M (+$46.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$886.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$56.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$46.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$103.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$34.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$46.6M
Modeled Uplift
$31.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$15.1M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $31.5M (vs $46.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$17.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$17.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$10.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$567K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$46.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$17.7M$17.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$17.1M$487K$17.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.7M$8.1M$10.8M$34.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$567K$567K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$4.4M$8.9M$13.3M$17.7M$17.7M$17.7M$17.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$4.4M$8.8M$13.2M$17.5M$17.5M$17.5M$17.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$3.6M$7.2M$10.8M$10.8M$10.8M$10.8M$10.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$284K$567K$567K$567K$567K$567K$567K
Cumulative$0$12.7M$25.4M$37.8M$46.6M$46.6M$46.6M$46.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $46.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x62% / 11.2x67% / 12.9x71% / 14.5x72% / 15.3x74% / 16.1x
9.0x57% / 9.6x62% / 11.1x66% / 12.5x68% / 13.2x69% / 13.9x
10.0x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.6x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.2x
11.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.5x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x
12.0x45% / 6.4x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.9x
Headroom (turns)
29%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 29% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.6x, adding 3.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$56.6M$56.6M6.4%
Year 1$58.3M+$31.1M$89.4M10.1%
Year 2$60.1M+$46.6M$106.7M12.0%
Year 3$61.9M+$46.6M$108.5M12.2%
Year 4$63.7M+$46.6M$110.4M12.5%
Year 5$65.7M+$46.6M$112.3M12.7%
$566.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.24B
Exit EV (11x)
$668.6M
Value Created
$112.3M
Exit EBITDA
$90.2M
Organic Growth
$466.2M
RCM Value Creation
$112.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$8.9M$13.3M$17.7M$21.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$8.8M$13.2M$17.5M$21.1M
A/R Days Reduction$5.4M$8.1M$10.8M$12.9M
Clean Claim Rate$284K$425K$567K$681K
Total$23.3M$35.0M$46.6M$55.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 29 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin6.4%-12.4%-2.0%5.3%
P79
Net-to-Gross47.0%23.5%27.1%29.5%
P83
Occupancy65.9%55.9%66.2%75.7%
P45
Rev/Bed$2.0M$1.1M$1.6M$1.9M
P83
Exp/Bed$1.9M$1.2M$1.5M$1.9M
P69

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML