Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MERCY REHABILITATION HOSPITAL - ST L 2026-04-26 09:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MERCY REHABILITATION HOSPITAL - ST L
CCN 263029 | MO | 90 beds | Current EBITDA $11.8M → Pro Forma $14.3M (+$2.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$47.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$11.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$14.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$2.5M
Modeled Uplift
$1.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$730K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.7M (vs $2.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$939K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$930K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$571K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$30K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$939K$939K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$904K$26K$930K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$144K$427K$571K$1.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$30K$30K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT45.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$235K$470K$704K$939K$939K$939K$939K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$232K$465K$697K$930K$930K$930K$930K
A/R Days Reduction$0$190K$381K$571K$571K$571K$571K$571K
Clean Claim Rate$0$15K$30K$30K$30K$30K$30K$30K
Cumulative$0$673K$1.3M$2.0M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x
9.0x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
10.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.5x47% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x
11.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.7x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.5x
12.0x28% / 3.4x33% / 4.2x37% / 4.9x39% / 5.3x41% / 5.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.5x
Headroom (turns)
-8%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -8% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.0x, adding 1.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$11.8M$11.8M25.2%
Year 1$12.2M+$1.6M$13.8M29.4%
Year 2$12.5M+$2.5M$15.0M32.0%
Year 3$12.9M+$2.5M$15.4M32.8%
Year 4$13.3M+$2.5M$15.8M33.6%
Year 5$13.7M+$2.5M$16.2M34.4%
$118.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$177.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$59.7M
Value Created
$16.2M
Exit EBITDA
$18.8M
Organic Growth
$24.7M
RCM Value Creation
$16.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$470K$704K$939K$1.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$465K$697K$930K$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$286K$429K$571K$686K
Clean Claim Rate$15K$23K$30K$36K
Total$1.2M$1.9M$2.5M$3.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 45 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin25.2%-17.7%-2.7%8.9%
P93
Net-to-Gross71.4%23.4%29.6%45.1%
P89
Occupancy74.6%46.3%64.3%75.0%
P71
Rev/Bed$522K$383K$1.1M$1.5M
P31
Exp/Bed$390K$429K$1.1M$1.6M
P20

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML