Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SSH - SPRINGFIELD INC. 2026-04-26 07:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SSH - SPRINGFIELD INC.
CCN 262017 | MO | 44 beds | Current EBITDA $127K → Pro Forma $1.4M (+$1.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$24.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$127K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$925K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$1.3M
Modeled Uplift
$938K
Risk-Adjusted
-$331K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$482K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$478K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$294K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$15K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$482K$482K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$464K$13K$478K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$74K$219K$294K$925K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$15K$15K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT47.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$121K$241K$362K$482K$482K$482K$482K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$119K$239K$358K$478K$478K$478K$478K
A/R Days Reduction$0$98K$196K$294K$294K$294K$294K$294K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K
Cumulative$0$346K$691K$1.0M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x139% / 78.5x145% / 87.5x149% / 96.6x152% / 101.2x154% / 105.7x
9.0x133% / 69.4x139% / 77.5x143% / 85.5x146% / 89.6x148% / 93.6x
10.0x128% / 62.1x133% / 69.4x138% / 76.7x140% / 80.3x143% / 83.9x
11.0x124% / 56.2x129% / 62.8x133% / 69.4x136% / 72.7x138% / 76.0x
12.0x120% / 51.2x125% / 57.3x129% / 63.3x131% / 66.4x133% / 69.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.7x
Headroom (turns)
88%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 88% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.8x, adding 7.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$127K$127K0.5%
Year 1$130K+$846K$976K4.0%
Year 2$134K+$1.3M$1.4M5.8%
Year 3$138K+$1.3M$1.4M5.8%
Year 4$143K+$1.3M$1.4M5.9%
Year 5$147K+$1.3M$1.4M5.9%
$1.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$15.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$14.3M
Value Created
$1.4M
Exit EBITDA
$202K
Organic Growth
$12.7M
RCM Value Creation
$1.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$241K$362K$482K$579K
Denial Rate Reductio$239K$358K$478K$573K
A/R Days Reduction$147K$220K$294K$352K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$12K$15K$19K
Total$634K$952K$1.3M$1.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 65 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.5%-16.3%-9.2%4.9%
P69
Net-to-Gross18.8%29.4%35.6%47.7%
P6
Occupancy83.9%27.7%42.3%63.5%
P91
Rev/Bed$548K$603K$1.0M$1.8M
P18
Exp/Bed$545K$646K$1.1M$1.7M
P18

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML