Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PEACE HAVEN ASSOCIATION 2026-04-27 03:58 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PEACE HAVEN ASSOCIATION
CCN 261993 | MO | 14 beds | Current EBITDA $113K → Pro Forma $203K (+$90K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
EBITDA BRIDGE  ·  CCN 261993

PEACE HAVEN ASSOCIATION
value-creation walk.

7-lever RCM bridge from current EBITDA to pro-forma — denial / underpay / DAR / coding / contract / cost discipline / cash acceleration. Each lever shows current vs benchmark target with data provenance.

$1.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$113K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$90K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$203K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+641bps
Margin Improvement
$54K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$90K
Modeled Uplift
$61K
Risk-Adjusted
-$30K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.1M (vs $0.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$35K
+251bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$28K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$17K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+68bp
Total EBITDA Impact$90K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$27K$8K$35K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$28K$28K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$4K$13K$17K$54K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT52.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$9K$18K$27K$35K$35K$35K$35K
Cost to Collect$0$7K$14K$21K$28K$28K$28K$28K
A/R Days Reduction$0$6K$11K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$26K$53K$74K$90K$90K$90K$90K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $90K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x62% / 11.1x66% / 12.7x70% / 14.3x72% / 15.1x74% / 15.9x
9.0x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.9x65% / 12.3x67% / 13.0x69% / 13.7x
10.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x64% / 12.0x
11.0x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x
12.0x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.4x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.8x
Headroom (turns)
28%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 28% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.7x, adding 3.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$113K$113K8.0%
Year 1$116K+$60K$176K12.5%
Year 2$120K+$90K$210K14.9%
Year 3$123K+$90K$213K15.2%
Year 4$127K+$90K$217K15.4%
Year 5$131K+$90K$221K15.7%
$1.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$2.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$1.3M
Value Created
$221K
Exit EBITDA
$179K
Organic Growth
$903K
RCM Value Creation
$221K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$18K$27K$35K$42K
Cost to Collect$14K$21K$28K$34K
A/R Days Reduction$9K$13K$17K$21K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$45K$68K$90K$108K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 39 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-17.6%-9.3%-0.4%
P0
Net-to-Gross99.7%35.9%42.9%52.5%
P97
Occupancy68.0%19.6%30.6%41.8%
P90
Rev/Bed$101K$705K$1.0M$1.8M
P3
Exp/Bed$214K$805K$1.1M$1.8M
P3

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML