Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — FREEMAN NEOSHO HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:10 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — FREEMAN NEOSHO HOSPITAL
CCN 261331 | MO | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $1.1M → Pro Forma $2.8M (+$1.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$32.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$1.7M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$609K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$658K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$652K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$401K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$21K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$658K$658K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$634K$18K$652K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$101K$300K$401K$1.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$21K$21K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT49.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$165K$329K$494K$658K$658K$658K$658K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$163K$326K$489K$652K$652K$652K$652K
A/R Days Reduction$0$134K$267K$401K$401K$401K$401K$401K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$21K$21K$21K$21K$21K$21K
Cumulative$0$472K$943K$1.4M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x76% / 16.7x80% / 19.0x84% / 21.2x86% / 22.3x88% / 23.4x
9.0x71% / 14.5x75% / 16.5x79% / 18.5x81% / 19.4x83% / 20.4x
10.0x66% / 12.7x71% / 14.5x75% / 16.3x77% / 17.2x78% / 18.1x
11.0x62% / 11.3x67% / 12.9x71% / 14.5x73% / 15.3x74% / 16.1x
12.0x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.6x67% / 13.0x69% / 13.8x71% / 14.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.2x
Headroom (turns)
49%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 49% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.3x, adding 5.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.1M$1.1M3.3%
Year 1$1.1M+$1.2M$2.3M7.0%
Year 2$1.2M+$1.7M$2.9M8.8%
Year 3$1.2M+$1.7M$2.9M8.9%
Year 4$1.2M+$1.7M$3.0M9.0%
Year 5$1.3M+$1.7M$3.0M9.1%
$11.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$33.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$22.1M
Value Created
$3.0M
Exit EBITDA
$1.8M
Organic Growth
$17.3M
RCM Value Creation
$3.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$329K$494K$658K$790K
Denial Rate Reductio$326K$489K$652K$782K
A/R Days Reduction$200K$300K$401K$481K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$16K$21K$25K
Total$866K$1.3M$1.7M$2.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 62 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.3%-17.7%-9.7%-0.7%
P81
Net-to-Gross24.5%33.3%39.7%49.9%
P8
Occupancy33.5%20.5%32.8%53.1%
P50
Rev/Bed$1.3M$573K$987K$1.7M
P65
Exp/Bed$1.3M$661K$1.0M$1.8M
P63

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML