Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LAFAYETTE REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER 2026-04-26 19:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LAFAYETTE REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER
CCN 261320 | MO | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-554K → Pro Forma $1.2M (+$1.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$33.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-554K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$1.8M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$642K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$677K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$670K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$412K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$22K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$677K$677K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$652K$19K$670K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$104K$308K$412K$1.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$22K$22K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT49.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$169K$339K$508K$677K$677K$677K$677K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$168K$335K$503K$670K$670K$670K$670K
A/R Days Reduction$0$137K$275K$412K$412K$412K$412K$412K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K
Cumulative$0$485K$970K$1.4M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-3.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
10.3x
Headroom (turns)
159%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 159% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -3.8x, adding 102.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-554K$-554K-1.6%
Year 1$-570K+$1.2M$617K1.8%
Year 2$-587K+$1.8M$1.2M3.5%
Year 3$-605K+$1.8M$1.2M3.5%
Year 4$-623K+$1.8M$1.2M3.4%
Year 5$-642K+$1.8M$1.1M3.4%
$-5.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$12.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$18.1M
Value Created
$1.1M
Exit EBITDA
$-882K
Organic Growth
$17.8M
RCM Value Creation
$1.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$339K$508K$677K$813K
Denial Rate Reductio$335K$503K$670K$805K
A/R Days Reduction$206K$309K$412K$494K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$16K$22K$26K
Total$891K$1.3M$1.8M$2.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 62 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-1.6%-17.7%-9.7%-0.7%
P73
Net-to-Gross25.1%33.3%39.7%49.9%
P10
Occupancy30.3%20.5%32.8%53.1%
P42
Rev/Bed$1.4M$573K$987K$1.7M
P68
Exp/Bed$1.4M$661K$1.0M$1.8M
P66

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML