Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SAMARITAN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 15:52 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SAMARITAN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 261313 | MO | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-3.1M → Pro Forma $-1.8M (+$1.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$25.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-3.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-1.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$975K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$1.3M
Modeled Uplift
$870K
Risk-Adjusted
-$467K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$508K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$503K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$309K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$16K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$508K$508K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$489K$14K$503K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$78K$231K$309K$975K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$16K$16K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT49.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$127K$254K$381K$508K$508K$508K$508K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$126K$252K$378K$503K$503K$503K$503K
A/R Days Reduction$0$103K$206K$309K$309K$309K$309K$309K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K
Cumulative$0$364K$728K$1.1M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-3.1M$-3.1M-12.2%
Year 1$-3.2M+$892K$-2.3M-9.0%
Year 2$-3.3M+$1.3M$-1.9M-7.7%
Year 3$-3.4M+$1.3M$-2.0M-8.0%
Year 4$-3.5M+$1.3M$-2.1M-8.4%
Year 5$-3.6M+$1.3M$-2.3M-8.9%
$-31.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$-24.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$6.2M
Value Created
$-2.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-4.9M
Organic Growth
$13.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-2.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$254K$381K$508K$610K
Denial Rate Reductio$252K$378K$503K$604K
A/R Days Reduction$155K$232K$309K$371K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$12K$16K$20K
Total$669K$1.0M$1.3M$1.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 62 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-12.2%-17.7%-9.7%-0.7%
P44
Net-to-Gross48.7%33.3%39.7%49.9%
P71
Occupancy30.1%20.5%32.8%53.1%
P40
Rev/Bed$1.0M$573K$987K$1.7M
P52
Exp/Bed$1.1M$661K$1.0M$1.8M
P58

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML