Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BELTON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 10:37 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BELTON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 260214 | MO | 62 beds | Current EBITDA $15.8M → Pro Forma $20.6M (+$4.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$92.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$15.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$20.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$4.8M
Modeled Uplift
$3.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.4M (vs $4.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$59K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.8M$1.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.8M$51K$1.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$283K$838K$1.1M$3.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$59K$59K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT40.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$460K$921K$1.4M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$456K$911K$1.4M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$373K$747K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$29K$59K$59K$59K$59K$59K$59K
Cumulative$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.9M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x
9.0x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x
10.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x
11.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x
12.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x44% / 6.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.0x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.5x, adding 2.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$15.8M$15.8M17.2%
Year 1$16.3M+$3.2M$19.5M21.2%
Year 2$16.8M+$4.8M$21.6M23.5%
Year 3$17.3M+$4.8M$22.1M24.0%
Year 4$17.8M+$4.8M$22.6M24.6%
Year 5$18.3M+$4.8M$23.2M25.2%
$158.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$254.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$96.8M
Value Created
$23.2M
Exit EBITDA
$25.2M
Organic Growth
$48.4M
RCM Value Creation
$23.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$921K$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$911K$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M
A/R Days Reduction$560K$840K$1.1M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$29K$44K$59K$71K
Total$2.4M$3.6M$4.8M$5.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 49 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin17.2%-16.3%-6.8%8.9%
P86
Net-to-Gross11.7%25.6%33.2%40.9%
P0
Occupancy59.0%42.0%53.7%75.0%
P51
Rev/Bed$1.5M$384K$1.1M$1.6M
P69
Exp/Bed$1.2M$426K$1.1M$1.7M
P57

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML