Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LEES SUMMIT MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 05:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LEES SUMMIT MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 260190 | MO | 80 beds | Current EBITDA $19.9M → Pro Forma $27.6M (+$7.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$146.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$19.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$7.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$27.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$7.7M
Modeled Uplift
$5.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.8M (vs $7.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$94K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$7.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.9M$2.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.8M$81K$2.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$450K$1.3M$1.8M$5.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$94K$94K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT40.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$733K$1.5M$2.2M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$726K$1.5M$2.2M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$595K$1.2M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$47K$94K$94K$94K$94K$94K$94K
Cumulative$0$2.1M$4.2M$6.3M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $7.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.3x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x
9.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x
10.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x
11.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.7x
12.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.4x
Headroom (turns)
6%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 6% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.1x, adding 2.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$19.9M$19.9M13.6%
Year 1$20.5M+$5.1M$25.6M17.5%
Year 2$21.1M+$7.7M$28.8M19.6%
Year 3$21.7M+$7.7M$29.5M20.1%
Year 4$22.4M+$7.7M$30.1M20.5%
Year 5$23.1M+$7.7M$30.8M21.0%
$198.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$338.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$139.6M
Value Created
$30.8M
Exit EBITDA
$31.7M
Organic Growth
$77.2M
RCM Value Creation
$30.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.5M$2.2M$2.9M$3.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.5M$2.2M$2.9M$3.5M
A/R Days Reduction$892K$1.3M$1.8M$2.1M
Clean Claim Rate$47K$70K$94K$113K
Total$3.9M$5.8M$7.7M$9.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 53 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin13.6%-16.3%-6.4%8.9%
P77
Net-to-Gross14.9%24.1%32.1%40.0%
P2
Occupancy85.0%42.0%51.1%74.6%
P89
Rev/Bed$1.8M$383K$1.1M$1.5M
P83
Exp/Bed$1.6M$429K$1.1M$1.6M
P70

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML