Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. LUKES HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:22 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. LUKES HOSPITAL
CCN 260179 | MO | 390 beds | Current EBITDA $15.9M → Pro Forma $46.1M (+$30.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$573.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$15.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$30.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$46.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$22.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$30.2M
Modeled Uplift
$19.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$10.5M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $19.7M (vs $30.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$11.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$11.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$7.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$367K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$30.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$11.5M$11.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$11.0M$316K$11.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.8M$5.2M$7.0M$22.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$367K$367K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.9M$5.7M$8.6M$11.5M$11.5M$11.5M$11.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.8M$5.7M$8.5M$11.4M$11.4M$11.4M$11.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.3M$4.7M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$184K$367K$367K$367K$367K$367K$367K
Cumulative$0$8.2M$16.4M$24.5M$30.2M$30.2M$30.2M$30.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $30.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x80% / 19.1x85% / 21.6x89% / 24.1x91% / 25.4x93% / 26.6x
9.0x76% / 16.6x80% / 18.9x84% / 21.1x86% / 22.2x88% / 23.3x
10.0x71% / 14.7x76% / 16.6x80% / 18.6x81% / 19.6x83% / 20.6x
11.0x67% / 13.0x72% / 14.8x76% / 16.6x77% / 17.6x79% / 18.5x
12.0x63% / 11.7x68% / 13.3x72% / 15.0x74% / 15.8x76% / 16.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.6x
Headroom (turns)
55%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 55% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.9x, adding 5.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$15.9M$15.9M2.8%
Year 1$16.3M+$20.1M$36.5M6.4%
Year 2$16.8M+$30.2M$47.0M8.2%
Year 3$17.3M+$30.2M$47.5M8.3%
Year 4$17.9M+$30.2M$48.0M8.4%
Year 5$18.4M+$30.2M$48.6M8.5%
$158.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$534.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$375.7M
Value Created
$48.6M
Exit EBITDA
$25.3M
Organic Growth
$301.8M
RCM Value Creation
$48.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.7M$8.6M$11.5M$13.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.7M$8.5M$11.4M$13.6M
A/R Days Reduction$3.5M$5.2M$7.0M$8.4M
Clean Claim Rate$184K$275K$367K$441K
Total$15.1M$22.6M$30.2M$36.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 30 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.8%-12.2%-2.6%4.7%
P67
Net-to-Gross27.7%22.7%26.9%29.5%
P53
Occupancy52.1%52.1%66.1%75.5%
P23
Rev/Bed$1.5M$1.1M$1.5M$1.9M
P47
Exp/Bed$1.4M$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
P37

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML