Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. LUKES DES PERES HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:32 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. LUKES DES PERES HOSPITAL
CCN 260176 | MO | 55 beds | Current EBITDA $-12.7M → Pro Forma $-8.6M (+$4.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$77.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-12.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-8.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$4.1M
Modeled Uplift
$2.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.6M (vs $4.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$946K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$50K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.6M$1.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.5M$43K$1.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$238K$707K$946K$3.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$50K$50K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT40.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$389K$777K$1.2M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$385K$769K$1.2M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$315K$630K$946K$946K$946K$946K$946K
Clean Claim Rate$0$25K$50K$50K$50K$50K$50K$50K
Cumulative$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.3M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-12.7M$-12.7M-16.3%
Year 1$-13.0M+$2.7M$-10.3M-13.3%
Year 2$-13.4M+$4.1M$-9.3M-12.0%
Year 3$-13.8M+$4.1M$-9.7M-12.5%
Year 4$-14.2M+$4.1M$-10.2M-13.1%
Year 5$-14.7M+$4.1M$-10.6M-13.6%
$-126.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$-116.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$10.1M
Value Created
$-10.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-20.2M
Organic Growth
$40.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-10.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$777K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$769K$1.2M$1.5M$1.8M
A/R Days Reduction$473K$709K$946K$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$25K$37K$50K$60K
Total$2.0M$3.1M$4.1M$4.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 50 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-16.3%-16.2%-6.9%8.8%
P24
Net-to-Gross21.0%25.7%33.2%40.7%
P18
Occupancy33.4%42.2%59.8%74.9%
P20
Rev/Bed$1.4M$383K$1.1M$1.6M
P64
Exp/Bed$1.6M$424K$983K$1.6M
P74

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML