Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — FREEMAN OAK HILL HEALTH SYSTEM 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — FREEMAN OAK HILL HEALTH SYSTEM
CCN 260137 | MO | 363 beds | Current EBITDA $17.5M → Pro Forma $48.4M (+$30.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$587.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$17.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$30.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$48.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$22.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$30.9M
Modeled Uplift
$20.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$10.3M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $20.6M (vs $30.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$11.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$11.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$7.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$376K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$30.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$11.8M$11.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$11.3M$323K$11.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.8M$5.3M$7.1M$22.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$376K$376K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.9M$5.9M$8.8M$11.8M$11.8M$11.8M$11.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.9M$5.8M$8.7M$11.6M$11.6M$11.6M$11.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.4M$4.8M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$188K$376K$376K$376K$376K$376K$376K
Cumulative$0$8.4M$16.8M$25.1M$30.9M$30.9M$30.9M$30.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $30.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x79% / 18.1x83% / 20.5x87% / 22.9x89% / 24.1x91% / 25.3x
9.0x74% / 15.8x78% / 17.9x82% / 20.0x84% / 21.1x86% / 22.1x
10.0x69% / 13.9x74% / 15.8x78% / 17.7x79% / 18.6x81% / 19.6x
11.0x65% / 12.3x70% / 14.0x74% / 15.8x75% / 16.6x77% / 17.5x
12.0x62% / 11.0x66% / 12.6x70% / 14.2x72% / 15.0x74% / 15.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.4x
Headroom (turns)
53%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 53% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.1x, adding 5.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$17.5M$17.5M3.0%
Year 1$18.0M+$20.6M$38.6M6.6%
Year 2$18.6M+$30.9M$49.5M8.4%
Year 3$19.1M+$30.9M$50.0M8.5%
Year 4$19.7M+$30.9M$50.6M8.6%
Year 5$20.3M+$30.9M$51.2M8.7%
$175.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$563.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$388.2M
Value Created
$51.2M
Exit EBITDA
$27.9M
Organic Growth
$309.1M
RCM Value Creation
$51.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.9M$8.8M$11.8M$14.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.8M$8.7M$11.6M$14.0M
A/R Days Reduction$3.6M$5.4M$7.1M$8.6M
Clean Claim Rate$188K$282K$376K$451K
Total$15.5M$23.2M$30.9M$37.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 30 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.0%-12.2%-2.6%4.7%
P70
Net-to-Gross20.4%22.7%26.9%29.5%
P17
Occupancy56.6%52.1%66.1%75.5%
P33
Rev/Bed$1.6M$1.1M$1.5M$1.9M
P63
Exp/Bed$1.6M$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
P53

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML