Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MERCY HOSPITAL SOUTH 2026-04-26 04:57 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MERCY HOSPITAL SOUTH
CCN 260077 | MO | 720 beds | Current EBITDA $-6.8M → Pro Forma $21.9M (+$28.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$545.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-6.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$28.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$21.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$20.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$28.7M
Modeled Uplift
$17.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$11.2M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Risks: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $17.5M (vs $28.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$10.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$10.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$349K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$28.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$10.9M$10.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$10.5M$300K$10.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.7M$5.0M$6.6M$20.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$349K$349K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.7M$5.5M$8.2M$10.9M$10.9M$10.9M$10.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.7M$5.4M$8.1M$10.8M$10.8M$10.8M$10.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.2M$4.4M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$174K$349K$349K$349K$349K$349K$349K
Cumulative$0$7.8M$15.6M$23.3M$28.7M$28.7M$28.7M$28.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $28.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-2.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
9.1x
Headroom (turns)
140%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 140% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -2.6x, adding 101.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-6.8M$-6.8M-1.2%
Year 1$-7.0M+$19.1M$12.1M2.2%
Year 2$-7.2M+$28.7M$21.5M3.9%
Year 3$-7.4M+$28.7M$21.3M3.9%
Year 4$-7.7M+$28.7M$21.0M3.9%
Year 5$-7.9M+$28.7M$20.8M3.8%
$-68.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$228.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$296.9M
Value Created
$20.8M
Exit EBITDA
$-10.8M
Organic Growth
$286.9M
RCM Value Creation
$20.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.5M$8.2M$10.9M$13.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.4M$8.1M$10.8M$13.0M
A/R Days Reduction$3.3M$5.0M$6.6M$8.0M
Clean Claim Rate$174K$262K$349K$419K
Total$14.3M$21.5M$28.7M$34.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 15 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-1.2%-4.8%-0.0%4.5%
P40
Net-to-Gross26.7%25.7%27.7%29.4%
P27
Occupancy52.3%56.8%66.2%74.2%
P13
Rev/Bed$757K$1.5M$1.7M$1.8M
P7
Exp/Bed$767K$1.4M$1.6M$1.9M
P7

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML