Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CAMERON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 09:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CAMERON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 260057 | MO | 42 beds | Current EBITDA $-7.8M → Pro Forma $-4.4M (+$3.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$65.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-7.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-4.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$3.4M
Modeled Uplift
$2.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.3M (vs $3.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$791K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$42K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.3M$1.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.3M$36K$1.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$199K$592K$791K$2.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$42K$42K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$325K$650K$975K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$322K$644K$965K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$264K$527K$791K$791K$791K$791K$791K
Clean Claim Rate$0$21K$42K$42K$42K$42K$42K$42K
Cumulative$0$931K$1.9M$2.8M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-7.8M$-7.8M-12.0%
Year 1$-8.0M+$2.3M$-5.7M-8.8%
Year 2$-8.3M+$3.4M$-4.8M-7.4%
Year 3$-8.5M+$3.4M$-5.1M-7.8%
Year 4$-8.8M+$3.4M$-5.3M-8.2%
Year 5$-9.0M+$3.4M$-5.6M-8.6%
$-77.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$-61.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$16.2M
Value Created
$-5.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-12.4M
Organic Growth
$34.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-5.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$650K$975K$1.3M$1.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$644K$965K$1.3M$1.5M
A/R Days Reduction$396K$593K$791K$949K
Clean Claim Rate$21K$31K$42K$50K
Total$1.7M$2.6M$3.4M$4.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 66 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-12.0%-16.3%-9.2%4.5%
P39
Net-to-Gross33.3%29.5%35.9%48.9%
P35
Occupancy42.0%24.9%41.6%62.7%
P50
Rev/Bed$1.5M$608K$1.0M$1.8M
P70
Exp/Bed$1.7M$661K$1.1M$1.8M
P73

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML